So, just a few days after Harriet Harman had said (sort of - see last post!) that her Labour colleagues on Newcastle City Council were definitely not cutting their arts budget by 100%, the councillors have come up with some money after all.
Or have they?
In a miraculous feat of prestidigitation, £600,000 has "appeared" out of some sort of magic hat to replace the £1.2 million arts subsidy.
Or has it?
Closer inspection of this "fund" shows that nothing will happen before 2016, and that some of the total figure is coming from hoped-for private donations (council leader has called for "very wealthy" Geordie celebrities like Sting to contribute), some from as-yet-unsolicited business largesse, and whatever they can get from selling the Lord Mayor's 18th century coach.
So for now, the arts are still getting a 100% cut, none of the libraries scheduled with closure are actually reprieved, and up in Newcastle the only art with a future is performing sleight of hand....
Friday 22 February 2013
Tuesday 12 February 2013
Money Matters
News in this week's Guardian on-line includes a piece about Newcastle City Council deciding to cut its Arts budget by 100 per cent.
This has been publicly backed by the shadow culture minister, Dan Jarvis, but criticised by many including the writer Lee Hall who said 'if as the shadow culture minister you cannot robustly and publicly defend the right of working-class and disadvantaged people to have access to libraries and culture, I do not understand what you are doing holding that brief'.
This little mess has prompted his boss, shadow culture secretary Harriet Harman, to deliver some damage limitation, but not in a way that stands up any sort of scrutiny. ‘There is not going to be a 100 per cent cut to the arts in Newcastle,’ she told The Guardian. ‘Across the board, they will be supporting the arts. I can’t give you the nitty-gritty . . .’
The facts, she means.
Actual, hard figures.
Finite numbers or information on where the funding will come from?
Anything at all that we can judge or evaluate?
Nope. Just some glib well-spun messages and the odd soundbite.
Maybe the plan is to leave one of those funny little notes for the next council leader telling him the money has run out so he can put it in a frame and ask the Arts Council if he can have a grant for it?
This has been publicly backed by the shadow culture minister, Dan Jarvis, but criticised by many including the writer Lee Hall who said 'if as the shadow culture minister you cannot robustly and publicly defend the right of working-class and disadvantaged people to have access to libraries and culture, I do not understand what you are doing holding that brief'.
This little mess has prompted his boss, shadow culture secretary Harriet Harman, to deliver some damage limitation, but not in a way that stands up any sort of scrutiny. ‘There is not going to be a 100 per cent cut to the arts in Newcastle,’ she told The Guardian. ‘Across the board, they will be supporting the arts. I can’t give you the nitty-gritty . . .’
The facts, she means.
Actual, hard figures.
Finite numbers or information on where the funding will come from?
Anything at all that we can judge or evaluate?
Nope. Just some glib well-spun messages and the odd soundbite.
Maybe the plan is to leave one of those funny little notes for the next council leader telling him the money has run out so he can put it in a frame and ask the Arts Council if he can have a grant for it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)